Case Study #6 — AAPL Debut: The Stabilizing Power of Diversifying Underlyings
💡 Reading time: ~7 minutes ｜ Series: Real-World Case Study #6
Two-trade overview
| # | Strike | Contracts | Open | Close | Days | Premium in | Cost to close | Net P&L | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $270 | 3 | 5/05 | 5/07 | 2 | $1,785 | $876 | +$909 | 1.1% |
| 11 | $285 | 3 | 5/07 | 5/15 | 8 | $2,040 | $960 | +$1,080 | 1.3% |
| Total | +$1,989 |
Why add AAPL in May?
In the first four months I only traded GOOG and NVDA. In May I decided to add a third underlying, for three reasons:
Reason 1: risk diversification
Volatility picked up in early May, and GOOG and NVDA are both tech growth stocks with highly correlated price action. Trading just those two means putting all your risk in one basket.
AAPL is also a tech stock, but it’s more “consumer electronics + services” — its volatility profile differs from pure-AI story NVDA.
Reason 2: AAPL’s low volatility is an advantage
| Underlying | 30-day historical volatility (May) | Premium fatness | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | High (40%+) | 🍖🍖🍖 | High risk, high return |
| GOOG | Medium (25%–35%) | 🍖🍖 | Balanced operations |
| AAPL | Low (20%–28%) | 🍖 | Steady rent |
AAPL’s premium isn’t as fat as NVDA’s, but it’s stable. While other positions were blowing up in May, AAPL provided reliable positive returns.
Reason 3: psychological safe haven
When your NVDA position is bleeding and GOOG is unstable, having a steadily-profitable AAPL in the account takes a lot of psychological pressure off.
Trading style: in and out fast
Notice the holding periods on these two — 2 and 8 days, both very short.
Reason: overall market volatility was high in May, so I didn’t want to be exposed anywhere for long. The strategy was simple:
- Open when IV is elevated (collect more premium)
- Hold 2–8 days, wait for IV drop or Theta decay to deliver profit
- Once up 40%–50%, leave
The role of the three underlyings
After half a year of trading, I’ve got a clear sense of each name’s role:
| Underlying | Role | Metaphor | Best timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | Heavy weapons | Main battle tank | Calm market + clear directional view |
| GOOG | Backbone | Infantry company | Most of the time, workhorse trades |
| AAPL | Steady defender | Fortification | Volatile markets, safe haven |
Best mix: equal one-third of margin across all three.
But in practice I leaned too heavily on GOOG and NVDA, only adding AAPL in May. If I’d run a three-leg allocation from the start, May’s losses would have been much smaller.
Advice for beginners
If you’re a beginner in options, I’d recommend starting with AAPL, not NVDA.
| Comparison | AAPL | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner friendliness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Volatility | Low (good for starters) | High (easy to crash) |
| Margin required | Lower | Higher |
| Lesson you learn | The steady rhythm of rent | The thrill of high risk and high return |
NVDA is like driving a sports car — exciting but easy to crash. AAPL is like driving a Toyota — boring but reliable.
Learn to drive the Toyota first, then the sports car.
📌 Little Otter: These two AAPL trades kept a sliver of rationality in May’s chaos. Diversification isn’t just about reducing risk — it’s the key to keeping your head clear in adverse conditions. Don’t put all your eggs in the NVDA basket.
Disclaimer: This article is a personal trading experience share, not investment advice.
Comments